My Celebrity Life

Channel 5 pays ‘substantial damages’ to ‘distressed’ couple featured on Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away

My Celebrity Life –

Channel 5 faced legal action from a couple who were left ‘distressed’ after featuring in Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away (Picture: Channel 5)

Channel 5 has paid ‘substantial damages’ to a couple who were left immensely ‘upset and distressed’ after appearing in an episode of Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away!.

Keith Wain and Julie Kelly, who were filmed in 2017, bought legal action against Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited claiming a ‘grave’ misuse of their private information.

On Monday, the High Court heard the pair were shown ‘in a state of considerable distress’ in the episode viewed by 6.7million people between 2017 and 2020.

In 2002, Mr Wain borrowed money from a private individual to invest in a business that failed, meaning he was unable to repay the loan and was subject to a county court judgment.

While the lender had agreed not to pursue the payment, in May 2017 High Court enforcement officers unexpectedly arrived at the couple’s house accompanied by a film crew.

Alex Cochrane, the couple’s lawyer, told the court: ‘He made it clear that the film crew was not to enter his home or to film him or Ms Kelly.

‘They knew from Mr Wain’s refusal to permit them entry that he did not want them to film him, the inside of the home he shared with Ms Kelly or what took place in the home.’

My Celebrity Life –

The couple were filmed in 2017 (Picture: Channel 5)

However, the pair were filmed by the enforcement officers’ body cameras and the footage was later used in the programme.

The episode in series five of Can’t Pay?, We’ll Take It Away! was initially seen by 2.5million people with Mr Wain and Ms Kelly’s faces shown, and a further 4.2million people watched an edited version where their faces were blurred and names removed.

The couple took legal action against Channel 5 and a statement was read to High Court judge Mrs Justice Collins Rice after the parties agreed a settlement.

Mr Cochrane said: ‘The broadcast of the programme has caused the claimants immense upset and distress. The claimants’ case is that the programme wrongly revealed matters that were private to them which took place in their home.’

He added: ‘They are both very private individuals and they live in a small community and word soon spread about the programme amongst people they know through work and socially.’

Tim James-Matthews, for the broadcaster, said: ‘It is the defendant’s case that it has at all times believed that this programme forms part of a series of real public interest where each of the stories involves a careful balancing exercise between matters of public interest and the right to respect for privacy.

‘It is prepared to accept, however, that on this occasion in relation to the claimants, it may well have got that balance wrong and for that reason it is prepared to settle their claim and also apologise to them for the distress caused to them by the broadcast of the episode in question.’

Mrs Justice Collins Rice added: ‘I do hope that today’s statement and the other terms of the settlement will assist Mr Wain and Ms Kelly to draw a line under this clearly upsetting episode.’

The judge continued that while the broadcaster worked on a case-by-case basis to balance privacy and the public interest, she suggested there is ‘perhaps an opportunity here’ to consider how the balance is struck and stories are approached.

In a statement outside court, Mr Wain said: ‘The Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away! television programme targets those who are down on their luck and in difficult financial situations.

‘We feel that the programme is best likened to a form of bullying as they pick on those in society who they think are unable to fight back because they do not have the means, whether that be financially or intellectually.

‘I would urge anyone who has found themselves a victim of this programme to take action.’

Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away followed the work of High Court Enforcement Officers  as they executed privately obtained High Court writs across England and Wales on behalf of private clients, on those who failed to make repayments on alleged debts or refused to vacate a property.

It first aired on Channel 5 in 2014 and ran for four years, spanning five seasons.


Credit: Original article published here.

Related posts

BBC Radio 1’s Scott Mills ‘bursting with happiness’ as he announces engagement to partner Sam Vaughan

John Turner

The Outlaws review: Star-studded Stephen Merchant series is Walken in a cringe comedy wonderland

John Turner

The Long Call episode 1 review: New ITV drama feels like Broadchurch revisited, but it’s worth staying for

John Turner
%d bloggers like this: